From wearable fitness-trackers to sleep-monitoring applications, mobile is the place to go for those looking to improve their health and well-being.
But the persistent lack of interoperability among today’s leading and emerging mobile health technologies has resulted in widespread frustration.
With simplicity at the core of the mobile revolution, it’s easy to understand why so many mobile device owners are irked by solutions that don’t share data to provide a complete 24/7 mobile health platform. People want these products to be capable of monitoring conditions, finding problems, recommending actions, and solving problems from sunrise to sunset.
If you think that sounds far-fetched, consider this: all of the resources consumers need to enjoy such an all-inclusive mHealth (mobile health) program already exist. But their respective makers haven’t yet played nicely together. And with these apps and devices operating independently of one another, fitness-minded consumers have struggled to piecemeal their mobile health solutions into a technological tapestry that makes sense.
So far, the result has been a hot mess of disjointed mobile products that, when viewed and cross-referenced autonomously, prompt more questions than answers for those these innovations were created to benefit in the first place.
According to the latest projections from ABI Research, the total market for wearable wireless devices in sports and healthcare will grow to 170 million units by 2017. When you consider the explosive growth enjoyed by companies already entrenched in this emerging market, it isn’t difficult to imagine how such lofty projections will be reached, or even exceeded.
Just last month, Fitbit, a startup celebrated for its assortment of digital fitness trackers and health devices, closed a $43 million funding round, pushing its valuation beyond the $300 million mark.
Similarly, the popularity of Jawbone Up — a wristband that tracks your movement and sleep — has helped Jawbone raise more than $200 million in venture funding from such heavyweight backers as Vinod Khosla, Kleiner Perkins, and Deutsche Telekom.
The unprecedented rate of growth has been no less staggering among today’s foremost mobile health applications.
Since launching only two months ago, Sleep Genius has earned a reputation for being the most scientifically advanced neuroscience-based mobile sleep program in the world. With 50,000 downloads in the past week alone and a consistent barrage of rave reviews, consumers are clearly getting serious about their sleep and counting on mHealth’s greatest resources to affect positive change.
But despite the standalone supremacy of these and other market-leading products, the scarcity of comprehensive solutions is a glaring void in modern mHealth.
“Most fitness and health apps only record a single type of data,” recently observed tech journalist Nick Summers of TheNextWeb. “I use a dozen or so different services to track my exercise regime, diet and sleep pattern as a result.”
As Summers explains, the issue at hand is that all of these remarkable and effective mobile solutions “live in their own little bubble.” Consequently, their true potential to help the mobile masses to the full extent possible remains restricted.
While it’s unrealistic to expect any single company – particularly a startup – to create a lone program that does it all, it is exponentially more feasible for the visionaries behind today’s most innovative mHealth solutions to integrate their resources and bring to market a total solution that benefits everyone.
Nike+ Running, for example, can map your runs and track your progress. But if you have a bad run, can it tell you why? If, perhaps, it was integrated with apps that detail your recent dietary habits and sleep patterns, insightful analysis and recommendations would be possible.
If you’re among the estimated 70 million Americans that the CDC classifies as sleep deprived, wouldn’t you benefit from more than just an app that monitors how much or how little you’re sleeping? What if Sleep Genius was a part of this mobile equation? An effective solution would be able to tell you if your athletic performance, weight, blood pressure, and other health factors are being negatively affected by sleep deprivation.
“What I want is recommendations,” Summers bemoans. “Actions that I can take, based on the information that I’ve already logged, to improve my wellbeing. The end-goal is this.”
Fortunately for the millions of consumers that share his frustration, the aforementioned end-goal is now in sight. The required solutions are in place and improving all the time. The next step toward integration simply needs to be taken.
Like a cautious parent,Facebook is giving teen users new freedom despite risks. For the first time, users under 18 can post publicly. The logic is that other sites don’t restrict kids, teens are getting more web savvy, and young celebrities want a voice. This could let minors publicly share things they’ll regret, so they must manually opt in to public sharing and confirm they understand the risks. Somewhat disingenuously, Facebook frames its blog post about the change as being about adding more protection for teens. It starts off saying that now when people age 13 to 17 sign up, their posts to the News Feed are defaulted to “friends only” instead of “friends of friends (fof)” as they were before. That is important because many people don’t change their default settings, and if you have thousands of friends with thousands of friends, the fof setting would share your posts to more than a million people.
But considering there are 1.15 billion people on Facebook already, and its growth has…
Instagram has gone through a whirlwind of changes the past few months. Between bookmarks, likable comments, live video, tags, zoom, drafts, Stories and of course the controversial algorithmic feed – no one can argue that the Facebook-owned photo sharing app hasn’t been innovating at a rapid pace. But the real question is what effect are these product enhancements having on the bottom line – which in the case of Instagram is measured in user growth. And the answers seems to be that it’s working. The app just announced that they have grown to over 600 million monthly active users. This is almost 10% of the world population – and 100 million more than the company had 6 months ago when they announced a milestone of 500M monthly actives. As a comparison, it took about 9 months to get from 400M to 500M monthly actives – so their growth is still accelerating, even with such a large user base. While the growth over the past 6 months was still broad-based, the company noted that they were doing p…